The following list will be up dated as new interesting material is discovered…

Don’t forget!

  1. WCAG 2.0 Checklist, in word and pdf.
  2. Mental map for WCAG 2 (Spanish)
  3. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 — 2.0 Transition Cheat Sheet

WCAG 2 Validators

  1. PISTA + WCAG 2 by Olga Carreras (Spanish)
  2. TAW (Spanish)
  3. Total Validator

Evangelization

  1. Ten reasons to use WCAG 2.0 (Spanish)

The conformance claim has several components, divided into 3 parts:

  • What pages conforms
  • What used technologies are “accessibility supported”
  • Optional components

WCAG 2 has thought on expressing conformance claims using metadata. We will see in other post how to do it. Meanwhile, use the natural text to do it.

What pages conforms (Required)

The whole site conforms: The ideal
On 14 October 2009, all Web pages at http://www.mydomain.com conform to Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 at http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-WCAG20-20081211/. Level A conformance.
Some parts of the site conforms: using regular expressions
On 14 October 2009, all Web pages at http://www.mydomain.com/(products|contact)/.* conform to Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 at http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-WCAG20-20081211/. Level A conformance.
Some parts of the site conforms: using boolean logic
On 14 October 2009, the following web pages conform to Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 at http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-WCAG20-20081211/. Level A conformance.
  • ( http://www.mydomain.com/
  • AND http://subdomain1.mydomain.com/ )
  • AND NOT ( http://subdomain2.mydomain.com/
  • OR http://subdomain3.mydomain.com/ )
Only one page
On 14 October 2009, the web`page “Contact” at http://www.mydomain.com/contact.html conforms to Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 at http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-WCAG20-20081211/. Level A conformance.

What used technologies are “accessibility supported”.(Required)

Tomorrow I will introduce what “Accessibility Support” means for WCAG 2. Meanwhile, get the short ideas: a technology is accessibility supported if that technology will work with user agents and assistive technologies and
a technology is relied upon if the content would not conform if that technology is turned off or is not supported.
Listed on a page
The documented set of accessibility-supported content technologies relied upon for this claim is listed at http://www.mydomain.com/accessibility/technologies.html
Listed on the claim
The technologies that this content “relies upon” is: XHTML 1.0 Strict, CSS 2.0 and JavaScript 1.2.
Subset of a list on a page
The documented set of accessibility-supported content technologies relied upon for this claim includes XHTML 1.0 and SMIL from “January 2009 list” at http://www.mydomain.com/accessibility/technologies.html#january2009.

Optional components

Going beyond the level
The following additional Success Criteria have also been met: 1.1.2, 1.2.5, and 1.4.3.
Technologies used (both relied and not relied)
  • The technologies that this content “relies upon” is: XHTML 1.0 (Strict), and Real Video.
  • The technologies that this content “uses but does not rely upon” are: JavaScript 1.2, CSS2.
User agents you have tested with
  • The user agents, including assistive technologies, that this content has been tested with can be found at http://www.mydomain.com/accessibility/test-technologies.html
  • This content was tested using the following user agents and assistive technologies: Firefox 1.5 on Windows Vista with Screenreader X 4.0, Firefox 1.5 on Windows XP SP 2 with Screenreader X 3.5, IE 6.0 on Windows 2000 SP4 with Screenreader Y 5.0, IE 6.0 on Windows 2000 SP4 with Screenreader Z 2.0, and Firefox 1.5 on Windows XP SP2 with Screenreader X 4.0, Safari 2.0 with OS X 10.4.

More info